On 10/26/2011 01:19 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
! resolved to an instriction sequence. */
"instruction"
no no, its a mashup of "restricted instruction".
ok, maybe not.
! gcc_assert (TREE_OPERAND (addr, 0) == fndecl);
! TREE_OPERAND (addr, 0) = builtin_decl_explicit(ext_call);
I do wonder if we ought not put the original back after the expand.
hum. I suppose that wouldn't hurt. I don't think it should make any
difference since Im not modifying whats in the table, but I can give it
a shot. If it bootstraps, which I presume it will, I'll check it in
with the original decl replaced.
Andrew
