Hi,
one more / RFC, for the ICE on invalid part of these issues with '->'.
The below tries to catch the problem very early, in
cp_parser_postfix_dot_deref_expression and apparently works fine, passes
the testsuite, etc. Is it too early? Is the check tight enough?
Thanks,
Paolo.
//////////////////////
Index: testsuite/g++.dg/template/crash109.C
===================================================================
--- testsuite/g++.dg/template/crash109.C (revision 0)
+++ testsuite/g++.dg/template/crash109.C (revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+// PR c++/50864
+
+namespace impl
+{
+ template <class T> T create();
+}
+
+template <class T, class U, __SIZE_TYPE__
+ = sizeof(impl::create<T>() -> impl::create<U>())> // { dg-error "not
a class member" }
+struct foo;
Index: cp/parser.c
===================================================================
--- cp/parser.c (revision 180532)
+++ cp/parser.c (working copy)
@@ -5673,6 +5673,15 @@ cp_parser_postfix_dot_deref_expression (cp_parser
{
if (name != error_mark_node && !BASELINK_P (name) && parser->scope)
{
+ if (TREE_CODE (parser->scope) == NAMESPACE_DECL
+ && TREE_CODE (postfix_expression) == ARROW_EXPR)
+ {
+ error_at (token->location, "%<%D::%D%> is not a class member",
+ parser->scope, name);
+ parser->context->object_type = NULL_TREE;
+ return error_mark_node;
+ }
+
name = build_qualified_name (/*type=*/NULL_TREE,
parser->scope,
name,