On 10/26/2011 06:20 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
I re-opened this one because: 1- We may want to fix it in 4_6-branch too, it's a regression there too; 2- We are still handling incorrectly the template impl case. For the latter a variant of my old idea still works, fwiw.
- object_type = TREE_TYPE (object); + object_type = (TREE_CODE (object) == ARROW_EXPR + ? TREE_OPERAND (object, 0) : TREE_TYPE (object));
This is still wrong. Why not use the same patch for 4.6 as for trunk? Jason
