Hi.
As new option mangles absolute path of a compiled file, it's hard
to come up with a scan-file pattern. Note similar test is done in
gcc.dg/profile-dir-*.c that I adjusted few days ago.
Ready for trunk?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2018-07-03 Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz>
* gcc.dg/pr47793.c: Remove.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr47793.c | 13 -------------
1 file changed, 13 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr47793.c
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr47793.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr47793.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 0ee1aaee421..00000000000
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr47793.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,13 +0,0 @@
-/* Bug pr47793: Allow relative paths in profile-generate. */
-/* { dg-do run } */
-/* { dg-options "-O -fprofile-generate=./" } */
-/* { dg-require-profiling "-fprofile-generate" } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-file pr47793.gcda "."} } */
-
-int
-main(void)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
-/* { dg-final { cleanup-coverage-files } } */
