On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 06:09:47PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jul 2018, H.J. Lu wrote: > > I will do the same for GCC8 backport. > > Can you please add a note to gcc-8/changes.html? This seems big > enough to warrant a note in a part for GCC 8.2. > > (At gcc-7/changes.html you can see how to go about this for minor > releases.) >
Like this? H.J. --- Index: changes.html =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-8/changes.html,v retrieving revision 1.88 diff -u -p -r1.88 changes.html --- changes.html 14 Jun 2018 13:52:35 -0000 1.88 +++ changes.html 14 Jul 2018 21:17:10 -0000 @@ -1312,5 +1312,23 @@ known to be fixed in the 8.1 release. Th complete (that is, it is possible that some PRs that have been fixed are not listed here).</p> +<!-- .................................................................. --> +<h2 id="GCC8.2">GCC 8.2</h2> + +<p>This is the <a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=RESOLVED&resolution=FIXED&target_milestone=8.2";>list +of problem reports (PRs)</a> from GCC's bug tracking system that are +known to be fixed in the 8.1 release. This list might not be +complete (that is, it is possible that some PRs that have been fixed +are not listed here).</p> + +<h3>Target Specific Changes</h3> + +<h4>IA-32/x86-64</h4> + <ul> + <li> <code>-mtune=native</code> performance regression + <a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84413";>PR84413</a> + on Intel Skylake processors has been fixed.</li> + </ul> + </body> </html>
