Hi Janus,
> the attached patch fixes the PR in the subject line in a rather > straightforward fashion. Pointer components of indirectly recursive > type are working already, as well as allocatable components of > directly recursive type. It seems this case was simply forgotten. That is correct. I was aware that it had been forgotten and is somewhere far, far down on my TODO list. Thank you for dealing with it. OK for trunk. Paul -- "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" - Albert Einstein
