Hi, Rainer, >From the comments you put into PR86519, for SPARC, looks like that only 32-bit >sparc has the problem. sparcv9 does NOT have the same issue.
I was trying to find the string to represent 32-bit sparc target, but haven’t found it. my guess is: sparc32*-*-*, is this correct? > On Aug 20, 2018, at 3:57 AM, Rainer Orth <r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> > wrote: > > Hi Jeff, > >>> >> Ugh. :( There's probably other targets that are going to have similar >> properties. I'm not really sure how to write a suitable assembler test >> for this. >> >> Maybe we just need a different search result for MIPS (and potentially >> other targets). > > we certainly do: I've reported a similar issue on sparc in PR > testsuite/86519, but powerpc and s390x are equally affected. do you mean that on powerpc and s390x, there is the same issue? I tried on powerpc machines, seems no such issue. please advice. thanks. Qing > > Rainer > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
