On 10/2/18 4:52 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> I saw the same failures:
>
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr49095.c scan-assembler-times \\), % 8
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr49095.c scan-assembler-times \\), % 8
>
> I think the new ones are better, especially in 32-bit case:
Excellent! Does the following test case patch make it so that
it PASSes again?
Peter
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr49095.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr49095.c (revision 264793)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr49095.c (working copy)
@@ -73,4 +73,5 @@ G (long)
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "test\[lq\]" } } */
/* The {f,h}{char,short,int,long}xor functions aren't optimized into
a RMW instruction, so need load, modify and store. FIXME eventually. */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\\), %" 8 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\\), %" 57 { target { ia32 } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\\), %" 45 { target { lp64 } } } } */
