On Tue, 23 Oct 2018, Aldy Hernandez wrote: > > > + if (tem.kind () == old_vr->kind () > > + && tem.min () == old_vr->min () > > + && tem.max () == old_vr->max ()) > > + continue; > > I think it would be cleaner to use tem.ignore_equivs_equal_p (*old_vr). The > goal was to use == when the equivalence bitmap should be taken into account, > or ignore_equivs_equal_p() otherwise.
Ah, didn't know of that function (and yes, I wanted to ignore equivs). Will try to remember together with the dump thing David noticed. Richard. > (Unless you really really don't want to compare the extremes with > vrp_operand_equal_p.) > > Aldy
