On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 12:30 PM <co...@sdf.org> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the detailed response.
> Sorry to give only a partial reply.
>
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 02:36:57PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> > Thanks for posting this.  Before we can commit it, however, we need to
> > sort out the authorship and ensure that all the appropriate copyright
> > assignments are in place.  Are you the sole author, or are other NetBSD
> > developers involved?
>
> The authors of these patches to netbsd are:
> - matt thomas
> - nick hudson

I see assignments for the following people for past and future changes
on fencepost for GCC :

Matthew Thomas (matt at 3am-software dot com) and Nicholas Hudson
(with a nick at nthcliff dot demon dot co dot uk email address).  Not
sure if Nick Hudson is the same as the person in the copyright
assignment as I don't have an email address to check this against.

I see nothing for Matthew Green for GCC .

regards
Ramana

> - matthew green
>
> They are all listed in MAINTAINERS files in FSF projects so I think they
> have a copyright assignment on file.
> Matt Thomas is unresponsive lately but I can ask someone to bug him in
> person.
>
> > > +/* Default to full VFP if -mhard-float is specified.  */
> > > +#undef SUBTARGET_ASM_FLOAT_SPEC
> > > +#define SUBTARGET_ASM_FLOAT_SPEC   \
> > > +  "%{mhard-float:%{!mfpu=*:-mfpu=vfp}}   \
> > > +   %{mfloat-abi=hard:%{!mfpu=*:-mfpu=vfp}}"
> >
> > Please rework this to use -mfpu=auto.  -mfpu=vfp is very rarely the
> > right setting to use.
>
> This change seems scary. Going over my default CPUs, I guess the
> problematic one might cortex-a8.
> I'm worried it might have negative repercussions for VFPv3-d16.
> Is that a valid concern?
> I see generic-armv7-a is a more popular default CPU, but I am not sure
> from reading the code that it avoids this problem.
>
> Thanks.

Reply via email to