>>We are runing the make check-gcc(x86_64) and will let know for any
>>regressions .
No regress found .
~Umesh
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 5:18 PM Umesh Kalappa <umesh.kalap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thank you Jason and Marek for the suggestions .
>
> Attached patch(pr86512.patch) along the Changelog .
>
> and also please note tested the patch for x86_64 only with "make -k
> check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=dg.exp=g++.dg" and see no regressions.
>
> We are runing the make check-gcc(x86_64) and will let know for any
> regressions .
>
> Meanwhile ,Please let us know your thoughts on the patch.
>
> Thank you
> ~Umesh
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 2:55 AM Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:40 AM Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 11:49:55AM +0530, Umesh Kalappa wrote:
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > the following patch fix the subjected issue
> > > >
> > > > Index: gcc/cp/parser.c
> > > > ===================================================================
> > > > --- gcc/cp/parser.c (revision 266026)
> > > > +++ gcc/cp/parser.c (working copy)
> > > > @@ -24615,6 +24615,8 @@
> > > > {
> > > > tree expr;
> > > > cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer);
> > > > +
> > > > + inject_this_parameter (current_class_type, TYPE_UNQUALIFIED);
> > > >
> > > > if (cp_lexer_peek_token (parser->lexer)->type == CPP_OPEN_PAREN)
> > > > {
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ok to commit along the testcase with changelog update ?
> > >
> > > Thanks for the patch.
> > >
> > > Please also include the testcase along with the patch (and I think it
> > > should
> > > also test noexcept in a template). Please also include a ChangeLog entry
> > > in the patch submission.
> > >
> > > Can you describe how this patch has been tested?
> > >
> > > Further, wouldn't it be better to call inject_this_parameter inside the
> > > CPP_OPEN_PAREN block? If noexcept doesn't have any expression, then it
> > > can't refer to "this".
> >
> > Agreed, thanks. You also need to restore the old
> > current_class_{ptr,ref} at the end of the noexcept-specifier.
> >
> > Jason
