On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 08:31:32AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On November 16, 2018 10:10:00 PM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek
> <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: Can you add a comment why doing it differently
> for this case is necessary or do it the same way in all cases?
Do you mean in omp-expand.c or dwarf2out.c? I believe I'm doing it the same
way in all cases (except for the grid stuff for now where I'm deferring to
Martin). In dwarf2out.c the change just makes sure that for each function
its decl_function_context is handled before that function, while before it
was guaranteed just for one level.
> I guess
> there might be latent issues for nested functions inside nested functions?
I think the change was for Ada, not really sure if one can have nested
functions inside of nested functions. E.g. I think in Fortran one can't, in
GNU C one can.
Jakub
