On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 7:36 AM Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 28 July 2018 at 01:13, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On July 27, 2018 3:33:59 PM GMT+02:00, "Martin Liška" <mli...@suse.cz> > > wrote: > >>On 07/11/2018 02:31 PM, Richard Biener wrote: > >>> Why not simply make popcountdi available in the kernel? They do have > >>> implementations for other libgcc functions IIRC. > >> > >>Can you please Kugan create Linux kernel bug for that? So that > >>discussion > >>can happen? > > > > There's no discussion necessary, libgcc is the core compiler runtime. If > > you choose not to use it you have to provide your own implementation. > > Created a bug against kernel at > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200671 Looks like it's concerned whether GCC would generate more inefficient code now. If that's true, it might be better to disable this somehow for some cases? otherwise, could someone reason about it in that kernel bug in order to push forward a fix in kernel please?
Thanks, bin > > Thanks, > Kugan > > > > Richard. > > > >>Thanks, > >>Martin > >
