Hi!

The only documented supported content of naked functions is basic asm
statement(s).  Those don't have clobbers though, so we should ignore
naked functions for IPA-RA; if they are written the only supported way,
they will appear not to clobber any registers at all and IPA-RA will then
assume they don't clobber any registers.
While naked is a target attribute supported only on a subset of targets,
the generic code already handles it in multiple spots, so I think we can add
another spot rather than introducing a target hook for it.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2018-12-07  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR target/85593
        * final.c (rest_of_handle_final): Don't call collect_fn_hard_reg_usage
        for functions with naked attribute.

        * gcc.target/i386/pr85593.c: New test.

--- gcc/final.c.jj      2018-11-21 19:38:50.264064648 +0100
+++ gcc/final.c 2018-12-06 19:01:39.052525201 +0100
@@ -4659,7 +4659,11 @@ rest_of_handle_final (void)
   final_start_function_1 (&first, asm_out_file, &seen, optimize);
   final_1 (first, asm_out_file, seen, optimize);
   if (flag_ipa_ra
-      && !lookup_attribute ("noipa", DECL_ATTRIBUTES (current_function_decl)))
+      && !lookup_attribute ("noipa", DECL_ATTRIBUTES (current_function_decl))
+      /* Functions with naked attributes are supported only with basic asm
+        statements in the body, thus for supported use cases the information
+        on clobbered registers is not available.  */
+      && !lookup_attribute ("naked", DECL_ATTRIBUTES (current_function_decl)))
     collect_fn_hard_reg_usage ();
   final_end_function ();
 
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr85593.c.jj  2018-12-06 19:19:17.286362641 
+0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr85593.c     2018-12-06 19:18:47.188850564 
+0100
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+/* PR target/85593 */
+/* { dg-do run { target { { i?86-*-linux* x86_64-*-linux* } && lp64 } } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+
+__attribute__((naked)) void
+bar (void)
+{
+  asm ("xorl %eax, %eax\n\t"
+       "xorl %edx, %edx\n\t"
+       "xorl %ecx, %ecx\n\t"
+       "xorl %esi, %esi\n\t"
+       "xorl %edi, %edi\n\t"
+       "xorl %r8d, %r8d\n\t"
+       "xorl %r9d, %r9d\n\t"
+       "xorl %r10d, %r10d\n\t"
+       "xorl %r11d, %r11d\n\t"
+       "ret");
+}
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+  int a = 42;
+  asm ("" : "+r" (a));
+  bar ();
+  asm ("" : "+r" (a));
+  if (a != 42)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+  return 0;
+}

        Jakub

Reply via email to