On 12/11/2018 02:25 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 3:05 AM Pedro Alves <pal...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Ian earlier mentioned that we've wanted to avoid malloc because some >> programs call the demangler from a signal handler, but it seems like >> we already do, these functions already aren't safe to use from >> signal handlers as is. Where does the "we can't use malloc" idea >> come from? Is there some entry point that avoids >> the malloc/realloc/free calls? > > cplus_demangle_v3_callback and cplus_demangle_print_callback. Ah, gotcha. Thanks! Interesting. Pedro Alves
