On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 2:32 PM Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 1/16/19 4:48 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > > This PR reports a bug where we select a non-const operator function and > > then apply it to a const object. That's happening because the > > expression 'c[0]' is not dependent, so we figure end up resolving it. > > But the lambda capture logic doesn't capture 'c' at that point and we > > have a non-const qualified 'c'. At instantiation time we do the capture > > and the by-value lambda results in const-qualified captures. > > > > Jason, the orginal test in process_outer_var_ref looked a little funky > > -- why not just processing_template_decl? That would satisfy what the > > comment says it checking. Anyway changing the test to check DECL's > > type-dependency makes the right things happen, and a bootstrap passes. > > Could you review please. > > Hmm, I don't remember exactly my rationale for deferring captures within > a template, but if this doesn't obviously break anything it seems > reasonable. Go ahead. >
This caused: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88995 We are working on a smaller testcase. -- H.J.
