On 1/24/19 2:53 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,as far as I can see this ICE on invalid points to a substantive, if minor, weakness of our implementation of the destroying operator delete facility: we aren't implementing the bits, per 7.6.2.5/(10.1), about destroying operator delete having precedence over any other operator delete. Thus the below, which is the most straightforward implementation I have been able to figure out given the current infrastructure. Tested x86_64-linux.
OK, thanks. Jason
