On 1/25/19 8:48 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
PR c++/89036 reports an ICE due to this assertion failing
1136 /* A class should never have more than one destructor. */
1137 gcc_assert (!current_fns || via_using || !DECL_DESTRUCTOR_P (method));
on this template with a pair of dtors, with
mutually exclusive "requires" clauses:
template<typename T>
struct Y {
~Y() requires(true) = default;
~Y() requires(false) {}
};
(is this valid? my knowledge of this part of C++ is fairly hazy)
Yes. A more sensible example would have 'true' and 'false' replaced by
something determined from the template parms.
Nathan introduced this assertion as part of:
ca9219bf18c68a001d62ecb981bc9176b0feaf12 (aka r251340):
2017-08-24 Nathan Sidwell <nat...@acm.org>
Conversion operators kept on single overload set
I'd just drop the assert at this point.
nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell
