Hi Dominique, I discovered the same thing myself this morning. The patch was developed on 8-branch because my working trunk had a hefty patch in an intermediate state of development. I cleared it off,ready to do the commit, and discovered the change on regtesting. I am trying to think of a way in which to distinguish the two cases.
Thanks Paul On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 at 10:33, Dominique d'Humières <domi...@lps.ens.fr> wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > With your patch the error for the test gfortran.dg/pr88376.f90 is changed from > > Error: 'n' at (1) is not a function > > to > > Error: Specification function 'n' at (1) must be PURE > > TIA > > Dominique -- "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" - Albert Einstein
