On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 07:14:05PM +0800, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> > As
> > #define INFTY 10000000
> > what is the reason to keep the previous condition as well?
> > I mean, if cost1.cost == INFTY or cost2.cost == INFTY,
> > cost1.cost + cost2.cost >= INFTY too.
> > Unless costs can go negative.
> It's a bit complicated, but in general, costs can go negative.
Ok, no objections from me then (but as I don't know anything about it,
not an ack either; you are ivopts maintainer, so you don't need one).
Jakub
