On 10/05/2019 00:33, co...@sdf.org wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 05:36:47PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: >>> So we're well into stage4 which means technically it's too late for >>> something like this. However, given it's limited scope I won't object >>> if the ARM port maintainers want to go forward. Otherwise I'll queue it >>> for gcc-10. >>> >>> jeff >>> >> >> I was about to approve this (modulo removing the now obsolete >> FPU_DEFAULT macro), until I noticed that it also modifies the generic >> NetBSD code as well. I'm certainly not willing to approve that myself >> at this late stage, but if one of the NetBSD OS maintainers wants to >> step up and do so, I'll happily take the Arm back-end code as that's not >> a primary or secondary target. >> >> R. > > Congrats on a new release :-) > ping >
I was hoping to get a comment from one of the netbsd port maintainers on the changes to the common NetBSD code. Are they no-longer active? R.
