On 13/05/19 13:11 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 13/05/19 14:02 +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Hi Jonathan,

On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 23:41, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote:

More Doxygenation.

Tested powerpc64le-linux. Committed to trunk.



You've probably noticed by now, but this introduced a regression (!):
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/Wattributes1.C  -std=c++14  (test for warnings, line 125)

Erm, yes, let's pretend I'd run the compiler testsuite and noticed by
now, shall we? :-)

This is because you added a line to libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/new and the
warning now appears at line 126....

I can certainly patch the test and replace 125 with 126 in it, I'm
just not sure want to keep this fragile dependency?

Yeah, I hate dg-error line numbers that refer into some arbitrary line
of a header. I'll take care of it, thanks for pointing it out.


Fixed at r271133.

Reply via email to