Hi Uros,
On 17 Nov 2011, at 14:02, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Iain Sandoe
<develo...@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk> wrote:
On 17 Nov 2011, at 10:49, Alan Modra wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:54:23AM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
The solution for this problem is to search for
"simulate_thread_done"
in gdb log.
Thanks! I like this for another reason too: I've seen these tests
fail due to gdb never reporting simulate_thread_main on any
instruction in that function.
... works for me on powerpc-darwin9 ...
with a local experimental 7.3.1 port to powerpc-darwin9, some more
tests
pass, but not all ...
... what base version/patch is needed to get all the tests to pass
for you?
It looks to me that you will also need following rs6000 gdb patch,
otherwise relative addresses of a conditional branch will be
calculated against opening lwarx/ldarx instruction:
--- rs6000-tdep.c 2011-03-18 19:52:31.000000000 +0100
+++ rs6000-tdep.c.ub 2011-11-17 14:58:46.000000000 +0100
@@ -1126,7 +1126,7 @@ ppc_deal_with_atomic_sequence (struct fr
if (absolute)
breaks[1] = immediate;
else
- breaks[1] = pc + immediate;
+ breaks[1] = loc + immediate;
bc_insn_count++;
last_breakpoint++;
Excellent!!!
Native configuration is powerpc-apple-darwin9
Running target unix/-m32
Using /usr/local/dejagnu-1-4-4/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as
board description file for target.
Using /usr/local/dejagnu-1-4-4/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as
generic interface file for target.
Using /GCC/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/testsuite/config/default.exp as tool-and-
target-specific interface file.
Running /GCC/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/simulate-thread/
simulate-thread.exp ...
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 108
# of unsupported tests 22
/Volumes/ScratchCS/gcc-4-7-trunk-build/gcc/xgcc version 4.7.0
20111117 (experimental) [trunk revision 181436] (GCC)
(I haven't finished the m64 gdb port yet, so can't try that at the
moment).
:-)
Iain
