Mike Stump wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2011, at 9:04 AM, "Ulrich Weigand" <uweig...@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Huh, it seems the test in this form assumes the assembler supports /* ...
> > */
> > comments. But this isn't really necessary for the test to work; I think the
> > best fix would be to just remove the comment and simply write 20
> > __asm__ volatile ("" : : "nro" (e1), "nro" (e2), "nro" (e3 ...
> > instead.
>
> Sounds good to me.
OK, I've checked in the following patch.
Tested on i386-linux.
Bye,
Ulrich
ChangeLog:
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr44707.c: Do not assume assembler
supports /* ... */ comments.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr44707.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr44707.c (revision 181162)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr44707.c (working copy)
@@ -9,6 +9,6 @@
int e3 = v.b;
int e4 = v.c;
int e5 = v.d;
- __asm__ volatile ("/* %0 %1 %2 %3 %4 */" : : "nro" (e1), "nro" (e2), "nro"
(e3), "nro" (e4), "nro" (e5));
+ __asm__ volatile ("" : : "nro" (e1), "nro" (e2), "nro" (e3), "nro" (e4),
"nro" (e5));
}
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
ulrich.weig...@de.ibm.com
