On 7/4/19 5:03 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 10:38 AM Martin Liška <mli...@suse.cz> wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> Recently I've introduced a new .gnu.lto_.lto section that
>> is supposed to provide meta information about a LTO bytecode.
>>
>> As a further step, I'm planning to teach binutils about
>> existence of the section and I'll remove in the future
>> emission of __gnu_lto_slim and __gnu_lto_v1 symbols.
>> The former one is used by binutils to identify if
>> an object is a slim LTO object. The later one is currently
>> used only in gcc/collect2.c and was added by David's patch.
>>
>> My question is: Can we remove __gnu_lto_v1 right now and
>> XCOFF will use something similar to ELF (has_lto_section)?
>> Can you David help me with that please?
> 
> LTO currently does not work on AIX. I added the __gnu_lto_v1 as a
> test. You can rip it out and XCOFF will follow a different path when
> implementing LTO.

Great. Then I'm sending revert of the patch.

Ready to be installed?
Thanks,
Martin

> 
> Thanks David
> 

>From d34a25ca594e9b8c41af56b812faf2f8cdafd010 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 17:38:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Revert r254460 (collect2 LTO for AIX).

gcc/ChangeLog:

2019-07-04  Martin Liska  <mli...@suse.cz>

	* collect2.c (defined): Revert to before r254460.
	(scan_prog_file): Revert to before r254460.
---
 gcc/collect2.c | 22 +++-------------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/collect2.c b/gcc/collect2.c
index d6a7355e218..e25e33962fb 100644
--- a/gcc/collect2.c
+++ b/gcc/collect2.c
@@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ static const char *const target_machine = TARGET_MACHINE;
 
    Return 0 if not found, otherwise return its name, allocated with malloc.  */
 
-#if defined (OBJECT_FORMAT_NONE) || defined (OBJECT_FORMAT_COFF)
+#ifdef OBJECT_FORMAT_NONE
 
 /* Add an entry for the object file NAME to object file list LIST.
    New entries are added at the end of the list. The original pointer
@@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ add_lto_object (struct lto_object_list *list, const char *name)
 
   list->last = n;
 }
-#endif
+#endif /* OBJECT_FORMAT_NONE */
 
 
 /* Perform a link-time recompilation and relink if any of the object
@@ -2799,10 +2799,8 @@ scan_prog_file (const char *prog_name, scanpass which_pass,
   LDFILE *ldptr = NULL;
   int sym_index, sym_count;
   int is_shared = 0;
-  int found_lto = 0;
 
-  if (which_pass != PASS_FIRST && which_pass != PASS_OBJ
-      && which_pass != PASS_LTOINFO)
+  if (which_pass != PASS_FIRST && which_pass != PASS_OBJ)
     return;
 
 #ifdef COLLECT_EXPORT_LIST
@@ -2815,7 +2813,6 @@ scan_prog_file (const char *prog_name, scanpass which_pass,
      eliminate scan_libraries() function.  */
   do
     {
-      found_lto = 0;
 #endif
       /* Some platforms (e.g. OSF4) declare ldopen as taking a
 	 non-const char * filename parameter, even though it will not
@@ -2858,19 +2855,6 @@ scan_prog_file (const char *prog_name, scanpass which_pass,
 			++name;
 #endif
 
-                      if (which_pass == PASS_LTOINFO)
-                        {
-			  if (found_lto)
-			    continue;
-			  if (strncmp (name, "__gnu_lto_v1", 12) == 0)
-			    {
-			      add_lto_object (&lto_objects, prog_name);
-			      found_lto = 1;
-			      break;
-			    }
-			  continue;
-			}
-
 		      switch (is_ctor_dtor (name))
 			{
 #if TARGET_AIX_VERSION
-- 
2.22.0

Reply via email to