On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 02:20:24PM -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > On 7/8/19 1:43 PM, Marek Polacek wrote: > > For a long time I wished we had a table documenting the status of C++ defect > > reports in the C++ FE, like clang has [1]. I finally got around to tackling > > this bad boy and created <https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-dr-status.html> > > and will now commit the attached patch. > > > > The table was created by an awk script which processed > > <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_toc.html> and then I made > > a lot of manual changes. I also searched through 3000 C++ PRs and linked > > various PRs and changed the status of a few DRs. For this table to be > > useful it needs to be much more complete, but this is a good start. > > > > I'm not going to force anyone's hand to go over that list and update random > > DRs > > (though *any* help would be greatly appreciated; even a list of DR #s that > > you > > know are fixed would be useful), but please, when you fix a DR, reflect that > > in the table (or let me know and I'll update it for ya). I want to see more > > green! > > thanks for putting this together. Is it worth including the NAD entries? Or > perhaps not marking them as unknown status?
Good point. I've been meaning to do a pass over NADs and change their status to N/A or something. But I guess it'd be prudent to still check whether the compiler does the right thing, which is often non-trivial. I think we should include them in the list so that there aren't any numbers missing. Thanks for taking a look! Marek
