On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 3:01 PM Alexandre Oliva <ol...@adacore.com> wrote:
> On Aug 15, 2019, Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 1:39 PM Alexandre Oliva <ol...@adacore.com> wrote:
> >> If we just use the best-suited way to
> >> take the address of a function behind the compiler's back on each
> >> target variant, we're less likely to hit unexpected failures.
> > Perhaps we should use true absolute address:
> But why?  Using absolute addresses is not relevant at all to the test.
> We just need some means to take the address of foo without the
> compiler's realizing we're doing so.

The immediate of lea is limited to +-2GB, so we have in effect
-mcmodel=medium. Using movabs would be OK for all code models.


Reply via email to