On 05/09/2019 02.18, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 4:15 PM Rasmus Villemoes
> <li...@rasmusvillemoes.dk> wrote:
>>
>> This adds an asm_inline macro which expands to "asm inline" [1] when gcc
>> is new enough (>= 9.1), and just asm for older gccs and other
>> compilers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <li...@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/compiler-gcc.h   | 4 ++++
>>  include/linux/compiler_types.h | 4 ++++
>>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h b/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
>> index d7ee4c6bad48..544b87b41b58 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
>> @@ -172,3 +172,7 @@
>>  #endif
>>
>>  #define __no_fgcse __attribute__((optimize("-fno-gcse")))
>> +
>> +#if GCC_VERSION >= 90100
> 
> Is it too late to ask for a feature test macro? Maybe one already
> exists? 

No, not as far as I know. Perhaps something like below, though that
won't affect the already released gcc 9.1 and 9.2, of course.

gcc maintainers, WDYT? Can we add a feature test macro for asm inline()?
For context, I'm trying to add an asm_inline macro to the kernel source
that will fall back to asm when "asm inline" is not supported - see
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190830231527.22304-1-li...@rasmusvillemoes.dk/
for the whole thread.

From: Rasmus Villemoes <r...@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Subject: [PATCH] add feature test macro for "asm inline"

Allow users to check availability of "asm inline()" via a feature test
macro. If and when clang implements support for "asm inline()", it's
easier for users if they can just test __HAVE_ASM_INLINE rather than
juggling different version checks for different compilers.

Changelog:

gcc/c-family/

        * c-cppbuiltin.c (c_cpp_builtins): Add pre-define for
        __HAVE_ASM_INLINE.

gcc/

        * doc/cpp.texi: Document predefine __HAVE_ASM_INLINE.
---
 gcc/c-family/c-cppbuiltin.c | 3 +++
 gcc/doc/cpp.texi            | 5 +++++
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-cppbuiltin.c b/gcc/c-family/c-cppbuiltin.c
index fc68bc4d0c4..163f3058741 100644
--- a/gcc/c-family/c-cppbuiltin.c
+++ b/gcc/c-family/c-cppbuiltin.c
@@ -1383,6 +1383,9 @@ c_cpp_builtins (cpp_reader *pfile)
   if (targetm.have_speculation_safe_value (false))
     cpp_define (pfile, "__HAVE_SPECULATION_SAFE_VALUE");

+  /* Show the availability of "asm inline()".  */
+  cpp_define (pfile, "__HAVE_ASM_INLINE");
+
 #ifdef DWARF2_UNWIND_INFO
   if (dwarf2out_do_cfi_asm ())
     cpp_define (pfile, "__GCC_HAVE_DWARF2_CFI_ASM");
diff --git a/gcc/doc/cpp.texi b/gcc/doc/cpp.texi
index e271f5180d8..98f6d625857 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/cpp.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/cpp.texi
@@ -2386,6 +2386,11 @@ and swap operations on operands 1, 2, 4, 8 or 16
bytes in length, respectively.
 This macro is defined with the value 1 to show that this version of GCC
 supports @code{__builtin_speculation_safe_value}.

+@item __HAVE_ASM_INLINE
+This macro is defined with the value 1 to show that this version of GCC
+supports @code{asm inline()}.  @xref{Size of an asm,,, gcc, Using
+the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC)}.
+
 @item __GCC_HAVE_DWARF2_CFI_ASM
 This macro is defined when the compiler is emitting DWARF CFI directives
 to the assembler.  When this is defined, it is possible to emit those same

Reply via email to