On 9/20/19 2:18 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Yeah, an add_options_for_arm_vfp is what we ideally need here.
How about this version of the patch? The two test cases I also tweaked
to use it are the only ones that use the corresponding arm_vfp_ok
effective target.
-Sandra
2019-09-22 Sandra Loosemore <san...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/testsuite/
* lib/target-supports.exp
(check_effective_target_arm_vfp_ok_nocache): New.
(check_effective_target_arm_vfp_ok): Rewrite.
(add_options_for_arm_vfp): New.
(add_options_for_sqrt_insn): Add options for arm.
* gcc.target/arm/attr-neon-builtin-fail2.c: Use dg-add-options.
* gcc.target/arm/short-vfp-1.c: Likewise.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/attr-neon-builtin-fail2.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/attr-neon-builtin-fail2.c (revision 276004)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/attr-neon-builtin-fail2.c (working copy)
@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
/* Check that calling a neon builtin from a function compiled with vfp fails. */
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_vfp_ok } */
-/* { dg-options "-O2 -mfloat-abi=softfp" } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+/* { dg-add-options arm_vfp } */
extern __simd64_int8_t a, b;
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/short-vfp-1.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/short-vfp-1.c (revision 276004)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/short-vfp-1.c (working copy)
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_vfp_ok }
-/* { dg-options "-mfpu=vfp" } */
+/* { dg-add-options arm_vfp } */
int
test_sisf (float x)
Index: gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp (revision 276004)
+++ gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp (working copy)
@@ -3489,18 +3489,43 @@ proc check_effective_target_arm_soft_ok
}
}
-# Return 1 if this is an ARM target supporting -mfpu=vfp
-# -mfloat-abi=softfp. Some multilibs may be incompatible with these
-# options.
+# Return 1 if this is an ARM target supporting -mfpu=vfp with an
+# appropriate abi.
-proc check_effective_target_arm_vfp_ok { } {
+proc check_effective_target_arm_vfp_ok_nocache { } {
+ global et_arm_vfp_flags
+ set et_arm_vfp_flags ""
if { [check_effective_target_arm32] } {
- return [check_no_compiler_messages arm_vfp_ok object {
- int dummy;
- } "-mfpu=vfp -mfloat-abi=softfp"]
- } else {
- return 0
+ foreach flags {"-mfpu=vfp" "-mfpu=vfp -mfloat-abi=softfp" "-mpu=vfp -mfloat-abi=hard"} {
+ if { [check_no_compiler_messages_nocache arm_fp_ok object {
+ #ifndef __ARM_FP
+ #error __ARM_FP not defined
+ #endif
+ } "$flags"] } {
+ set et_arm_vfp_flags $flags
+ return 1
+ }
+ }
}
+
+ return 0
+}
+
+proc check_effective_target_arm_vfp_ok { } {
+ return [check_cached_effective_target arm_vfp_ok \
+ check_effective_target_arm_vfp_ok_nocache]
+}
+
+# Add the options needed to compile code with -mfpu=vfp. We need either
+# -mfloat-abi=softfp or -mfloat-abi=hard, but if one is already
+# specified by the multilib, use it.
+
+proc add_options_for_arm_vfp { flags } {
+ if { ! [check_effective_target_arm_vfp_ok] } {
+ return "$flags"
+ }
+ global et_arm_vfp_flags
+ return "$flags $et_arm_vfp_flags"
}
# Return 1 if this is an ARM target supporting -mfpu=vfp3
@@ -6678,6 +6703,9 @@ proc add_options_for_sqrt_insn { flags }
if { [istarget amdgcn*-*-*] } {
return "$flags -ffast-math"
}
+ if { [istarget arm*-*-*] } {
+ return [add_options_for_arm_vfp "$flags"]
+ }
return $flags
}
