Hi!
Tobias, if that's not inconvenient for you for any reson (which?), would
you please adopt the habit of using the same text for a commit's first
line in the log message (r276698: "Fortran - fix OpenMP 'target simd'),
and the email's "Subject" line ("[Fortran] Actually permit OpenMP's
'target simd'"). That's less typing for you ;-) -- and more importantly,
makes it easy to find one from the other.On 2019-10-09T08:04:29+0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot....@gmail.com> wrote: > On 8 October 2019 14:12:47 CEST, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: >>On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 02:04:17PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: >>> Seemingly, 'target simd' was forgotten – which yielded the error: >>> "Unexpected !$OMP TARGET SIMD statement" Shouldn't this get a PR opened, and the fix eventually backported also to release branches? (Note that at least for OpenACC changes, we're way, way behind on such backports...) > What is the reasoning to call the nonstandard abort instead if the usual STOP > N? (ACK, that works.) Grüße Thomas
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
