When we have -fstack-limit-symbol with sysv we can end up with a non-
existing instruction (you cannot add an immediate to register 0). Fix
this by using register 11 instead. It might be used for something else
already though, so save and restore its value around this. In
optimizing compiles these extra moves are usually removed again: the
restore by cprop_hardreg, and then the save by rtl_dce.
Committing to trunk.
Segher
2019-10-26 Segher Boessenkool <seg...@kernel.crashing.org>
PR target/91289
* config/rs6000/rs6000-logue.c (rs6000_emit_allocate_stack): Don't add
an immediate to r0; use r11 instead. Save and restore r11 to r0 around
this.
---
gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-logue.c | 12 ++++++++----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-logue.c b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-logue.c
index e98893a..04aae80 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-logue.c
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-logue.c
@@ -1700,10 +1700,14 @@ rs6000_emit_allocate_stack (HOST_WIDE_INT size, rtx
copy_reg, int copy_off)
stack_limit_rtx,
GEN_INT (size)));
- emit_insn (gen_elf_high (tmp_reg, toload));
- emit_insn (gen_elf_low (tmp_reg, tmp_reg, toload));
- emit_insn (gen_cond_trap (LTU, stack_reg, tmp_reg,
- const0_rtx));
+ /* We cannot use r0 with elf_low. Lamely solve this problem by
+ moving registers around. */
+ rtx r11_reg = gen_rtx_REG (Pmode, 11);
+ emit_move_insn (tmp_reg, r11_reg);
+ emit_insn (gen_elf_high (r11_reg, toload));
+ emit_insn (gen_elf_low (r11_reg, r11_reg, toload));
+ emit_insn (gen_cond_trap (LTU, stack_reg, r11_reg, const0_rtx));
+ emit_move_insn (r11_reg, tmp_reg);
}
else
warning (0, "stack limit expression is not supported");
--
1.8.3.1
