Sorry – I had fixed it locally before the commit, but forgot the "git
add" for that change :-(
Thanks for the fix.
Tobias
On 1/3/20 12:59 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 04:43:29PM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Committed as Rev. 279835 after building an regtesting the attached patch.
+UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/implied_shape_5.f90 -O0 compilation failed to
produce executable
+UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/implied_shape_5.f90 -O1 compilation failed to
produce executable
+UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/implied_shape_5.f90 -O2 compilation failed to
produce executable
+UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/implied_shape_5.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions compilation failed to
produce executable
+UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/implied_shape_5.f90 -O3 -g compilation failed to
produce executable
+UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/implied_shape_5.f90 -Os compilation failed to
produce executable
Fixed thusly, tested on x86_64-linux, committed to trunk as obvious.
2020-01-03 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
PR fortran/68020
* gfortran.dg/impled_shape_5.f90: Use dg-do compile rather than dg-do
run.
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/implied_shape_5.f90 (revision 279848)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/implied_shape_5.f90 (working copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-! { dg-do run }
+! { dg-do compile }
!
! PR fortran/68020
!
Jakub
