on 2020/1/13 下午6:46, Richard Sandiford wrote: > "Kewen.Lin" <li...@linux.ibm.com> writes: >> Hi, >> >> Function average_num_loop_insns forgets to free loop body in early return. >> Besides, overflow comparison checks 1000000 (e6) but the return value is >> 100000 (e5), I guess it's unexpected, a typo? >> >> Bootstrapped and regress tested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu. >> I guess this should go to GCC11? Is it ok? > > OK for GCC 10, thanks. This is a regression from GCC 7. > Hi Richard,
Thanks for correcting me it's a regression! Committed in b38e86ddb7a9. BR, Kewen
