Dimitar Dimitrov <dimi...@dinux.eu> wrote:
On Wed, 15.01.2020, 14:30:43 EET Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi David,
I've rebased and squashed the analyzer patch kit and squashed patch 2
of the hash_table fix into it, and re-tested it successfully, so I've
pushed it to master (as 757bf1dff5e8cee34c0a75d06140ca972bfecfa7).
I'm going to work through the various followup patches I had on my
branch and re-test and push to master those that seem appropriate.
I'm seeing quite a number of failures on Solaris (both sparc and x86),
but also some on 32-bit Linux/x86:
Running target unix/-m32
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 610)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 611)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 615)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 616)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 657)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 658)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 662)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 663)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 705)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 706)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 710)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 711)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 753)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 754)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 758)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 759)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for excess errors)
I see those errors on PRU and AVR backends.
Likewise, on 32b Darwin host and 32b multilib on 64b hosts.
+ a couple of others related to setjmp
not had a chance to triage any further yet.
cheers
Iain
