Hi Steve,

regarding the release-notes text: I like your version – it helps if someone writes the text, who knows what changed. I have fixed a typo and adapted the syntax – see attachment. Any comment to it? Otherwise, I intent to commit it tomorrow.

Regarding the patch, I enclosed a revised version. Do you have more suggestions – or does it look okay now?

Thanks,

Tobias

On 1/15/20 7:56 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
+    {
+      const char hint[] = ". Use %<-fallow-invalid-boz%> if you cannot fix it";
Suggest adding ". [See %<-fallow-invalid-boz%>.]"

Followed your suggestion.

--- a/gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi
+++ b/gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi
I have reworded it a bit.
-                         "nonstandard syntax", &gfc_current_locus))
+                         "nonstandard X instead of Z", &gfc_current_locus))
I suppose ok, but don't think a change is needed.
I still think the new version is more helpful. Hence …
diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-10/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-10/changes.html
index caa9df70..83404a1a 100644
--- a/htdocs/gcc-10/changes.html
+++ b/htdocs/gcc-10/changes.html
@@ -260,6 +260,16 @@ a work-in-progress.</p>
     with <code>-std=legacy</code>.  <code>-Wargument-mismatch</code>
     has been removed.
   </li>
+  <li>
+    The handling of a BOZ literal constant has been reworked to provide
+    better conformance to the Fortran 2008 and 2018 standards.  In these
+    Fortran standards, a BOZ literal constant is a typeless and kindless
+    entity.  As a part of the rework, documented and undocumented
+    extensions to the Fortran standard now emit errors during compilation.
+    Some these extensions are permitted with the
+    <code>-fallow-invalid-boz</code>, where the error is degraded to a
+    warning and the code is compiled as with older gfortran.
+  <li>
   <li>
     At any optimization level except<code>-Os</code>, gfortran now
     uses inline packing for arguments instead of calling a library
	PR fortran/93253
	* check.c (gfc_invalid_boz): Mention -fallow-invalid-boz
	in the error message.
	* gfortran.texi (BOZ literal constants): List another missing
	extension and refer to -fallow-invalid-boz.
	* lang.opt (fallow-invalid-boz): Also mention 'X' in the help text
	as it is not covered by the previous wording.
	* primary.c (match_boz_constant): Tweak wording such that it is
	clear how to fix the nonstandard use.

	PR fortran/93253
	* fortran.dg/boz_7.f90: Updated dg-error.

diff --git a/gcc/fortran/check.c b/gcc/fortran/check.c
index c7f0187b377..519aa8b8c2b 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/check.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/check.c
@@ -67,7 +67,12 @@ gfc_invalid_boz (const char *msg, locus *loc)
       return false;
     }
 
-  gfc_error (msg, loc);
+  const char hint[] = " [see %<-fno-allow-invalid-boz%>]";
+  size_t len = strlen (msg) + strlen (hint) + 1;
+  char *msg2 = (char *) alloca (len);
+  strcpy (msg2, msg);
+  strcat (msg2, hint);
+  gfc_error (msg2, loc);
   return true;
 }
 
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi b/gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi
index 4cf8b3a5c24..a50634ab9d2 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi
+++ b/gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi
@@ -1863,9 +1863,12 @@ Fortran standard states that the treatment of the sign bit is processor
 dependent.  Gfortran interprets the sign bit as a user would expect.
 
 As a deprecated extension, GNU Fortran allows hexadecimal BOZ literal
-constants to be specified using the @code{X} prefix.  The BOZ literal
+constants to be specified using the @code{X} prefix.  That the BOZ literal
 constant can also be specified by adding a suffix to the string, for
-example, @code{Z'ABC'} and @code{'ABC'X} are equivalent.
+example, @code{Z'ABC'} and @code{'ABC'X} are equivalent.  Additionally,
+as extension, BOZ literals are permitted in some contexts outside of
+@code{DATA} and the intrinsic functions listed in the Fortran standard.
+Use @option{-fallow-invalid-boz} to enable the extension.
 
 @node Real array indices
 @subsection Real array indices
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/lang.opt b/gcc/fortran/lang.opt
index 3858331bcc0..59523f74acf 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/lang.opt
+++ b/gcc/fortran/lang.opt
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ All intrinsics procedures are available regardless of selected standard.
 
 fallow-invalid-boz
 Fortran RejectNegative Var(flag_allow_invalid_boz)
-Allow a BOZ literal constant to appear in an invalid context.
+Allow a BOZ literal constant to appear in an invalid context and with X instead of Z.
 
 fallow-leading-underscore
 Fortran Undocumented Var(flag_allow_leading_underscore)
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/primary.c b/gcc/fortran/primary.c
index e2b6fcb2106..07b8ac08ba2 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/primary.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/primary.c
@@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ match_boz_constant (gfc_expr **result)
 
   if (x_hex
       && gfc_invalid_boz ("Hexadecimal constant at %L uses "
-			  "nonstandard syntax", &gfc_current_locus))
+			  "nonstandard X instead of Z", &gfc_current_locus))
     return MATCH_ERROR;
 
   old_loc = gfc_current_locus;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/boz_7.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/boz_7.f90
index 45fa7a7df19..d2a51ac03e2 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/boz_7.f90
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/boz_7.f90
@@ -7,6 +7,6 @@
 !
 integer :: k, m
 integer :: j = z'000abc' ! { dg-error "BOZ used outside a DATA statement" }
-data k/x'0003'/ ! { dg-error "nonstandard syntax" }
+data k/x'0003'/ ! { dg-error "nonstandard X instead of Z" }
 data m/'0003'z/ ! { dg-error "nonstandard postfix" }
 end

Reply via email to