On Fri, 21 Feb 2020, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > Hi, > > this fixes the signal handler calling signal unsafe vfprintf and/or passing > uninitialized memory to unlink in signal handler. > > This time it is the patch for the gcc-9 branch. > > The difference to the gcc-8 branch is in tool_cleanup: > The variable that suppress the vfprintf is verbose = false; > not debug = false, to match the different logic in maybe_unlink. > > > Bootstrapped and reg-tested with x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. > Is it OK for the gcc-9 branch?
OK. Richard.
