On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 9:53 AM Ian Lance Taylor <i...@airs.com> wrote:
>
> kamlesh kumar <kamleshbha...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > yes, current expected entry is wrong and
> > Nick's patch corrects that.
>
> Thanks. Nick, the patch is OK.
>
> Ian
> >> > libiberty/ChangeLog
> >> > 2020-01-20 Nick Clifton <ni...@redhat.com>
> >> >
> >> > * testsuite/demangle-expected: Fix expected demangling.
> >> >
> >> > Index: libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected
> >> > ===================================================================
> >> > --- libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected (revision 280157)
> >> > +++ libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected (working copy)
> >> > @@ -1449,4 +1449,4 @@
> >> > #PR91979 demangling nullptr expression
> >> >
> >> > _Z3fooILPv0EEvPN9enable_ifIXeqT_LDnEEvE4typeE
> >> > -void foo<(void*)0>(enable_if<((void*)0)==((decltype(nullptr))),
> >> void>::type*)
> >> > +void foo<(void*)0>(enable_if<((void*)0)==(decltype(nullptr)),
> >> void>::type*)
> >>
I checked in the patch for Nick.
--
H.J.
From 3bb6abbf4bb98e58663ec6c9bc77ae0bdbac6e41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nick Clifton <ni...@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 03:50:34 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Fix a libiberty testsuite failure
* testsuite/demangle-expected: Update expected demangling of
enable_if pattern.
---
libiberty/ChangeLog | 5 +++++
libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected | 2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libiberty/ChangeLog b/libiberty/ChangeLog
index 91ae004005f..4c8b236cf78 100644
--- a/libiberty/ChangeLog
+++ b/libiberty/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2020-03-02 Nick Clifton <ni...@redhat.com>
+
+ * testsuite/demangle-expected: Update expected demangling of
+ enable_if pattern.
+
2020-03-02 H.J. Lu <hongjiu...@intel.com>
PR lto/93966
diff --git a/libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected b/libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected
index daffe782112..ccadf84e608 100644
--- a/libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected
+++ b/libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected
@@ -1449,7 +1449,7 @@ Foo<int>()::{lambda(auto:1)#1}::operator()<char>(char) const::X::fn
#PR91979 demangling nullptr expression
_Z3fooILPv0EEvPN9enable_ifIXeqT_LDnEEvE4typeE
-void foo<(void*)0>(enable_if<((void*)0)==((decltype(nullptr))), void>::type*)
+void foo<(void*)0>(enable_if<((void*)0)==(decltype(nullptr)), void>::type*)
_ZNK5coro15emptyawEv
coro1::empty::operator co_await() const
--
2.24.1
