Thanks!
Fixed patch is attached.

Any other comments?

Changelog:
2011-12-14  Michael Zolotukhin  <michael.v.zolotuk...@intel.com>

        * gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-31.c: Adjust array size and test
        diag-scans to fix fail on AVX.
        * gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-36.c: Ditto.
        * gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-64.c: Ditto.
        * gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-66.c: Ditto.
        * gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-68.c: Ditto.
        * gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-69.c: Ditto.
        * gcc.dg/vect/no-vfa-vect-dv-2.c: Adjust dg-scans.
        * gcc.dg/vect/pr45752.c: Ditto.
        * gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-4.c: Ditto.
        * gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-9.c: Ditto.
        * gcc.dg/vect/vect-33.c: Ditto.
        * gcc.dg/vect/vect-35.c: Ditto.
        * gcc.dg/vect/vect-6-big-array.c: Ditto.
        * gcc.dg/vect/vect-6.c: Ditto.
        * gcc.dg/vect/vect-91.c: Ditto.
        * gcc.dg/vect/vect-all-big-array.c: Ditto.
        * gcc.dg/vect/vect-all.c: Ditto.
        * gcc.dg/vect/vect-multitypes-1.c: Ditto.
        * gcc.dg/vect/vect-outer-4c.c: Ditto.
        * gcc.dg/vect/vect-outer-5.c: Ditto.
        * gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-1.c: Ditto.
        * gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-3.c: Ditto.
        * gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-4.c: Ditto.
        * gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-1.c: Ditto.
        * gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-2.c: Ditto.
        * gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-3.c: Ditto.
        * gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-pattern-1b.c: Ditto.
        * gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-pattern-1c.c: Ditto.
        * gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-pattern-2b.c: Ditto.
        * gcc.dg/vect/wrapv-vect-reduc-pattern-2c.c: Ditto.
        * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_vect_any_perm): New 
function.
        (check_avx_available): Ditto.
        (check_effective_target_vect_sizes_32B_16B): Ditto.
        (check_prefer_avx128): Ditto.
        (check_effective_target_vect_aligned_arrays): Add handling of AVX.
        (check_effective_target_vect_multiple_sizes): Ditto.


On 14 December 2011 17:46, Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Just a nit:
>
> +proc check_prefer_avx128_specified { } {
>
> Please name this function check_prefer_avx128.  Nothing was specified 
> anywhere.
>
> Thanks,
> Uros.



-- 
---
Best regards,
Michael V. Zolotukhin,
Software Engineer
Intel Corporation.

Attachment: vec-tests-avx2_fixes-4.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to