On 3/24/20 11:45 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 10:41:28AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/20/20 7:02 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 02:12:49PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/20/20 1:06 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
Wonderful. I've added a bunch of tests, and some from the related DRs too.
But I had a problem with the class-or-decltype case: if we have
template<typename T> struct D : T::template B<int>::template C<int> {};
then we still require all the 'template' keywords here (as does clang). So I'm
kind of confused, but I don't think it's a big deal right now.
This seems related enough that I'd like to fix it at the same time; why
doesn't your patch fix it? Is it because typename_p is false?
Ah, I was mistaken. Of course we need the template keyword here: it's a member
of an
unknown specialization!
That's why it's needed in contexts where we don't know whether or not we're
naming a type. But where we do know that, as in a base-specifier, it isn't
necessary. This is exactly DR 1710: "The keyword template is optional in a
... class-or-decltype (Clause 11.7 [class.derived])...."
Duh, not sure what I was thinking.
I've implemented that in cp_parser_nested_name_specifier_opt: assume 'template'
if we've seen 'typename'. If it turns out that this is wrong because it
triggers in contexts where it shouldn't, we'll have to introduce something like
CP_PARSER_FLAGS_TEMPLATE_OPTIONAL.
With this another problem revealed: we weren't accepting an alias template
after 'template' which DR1710 says is valid. Fixed by the TYPE_ALIAS_P hunk
in the new check_template_keyword_in_nested_name_spec. (alias-decl1.C)
But this is still not over: I noticed that
template <typename T> struct S {
template <typename TT>
using U = TT;
};
template <typename T> typename S<int>::template U<T>::type foo;
is still rejected and shouldn't be. Here
check_template_keyword_in_nested_name_spec
gets
<template_type_parm 0x7fffeaa42690 U type_0 VOID
align:8 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set -1 canonical-type
0x7fffeaa420a8
index 0 level 1 orig_level 2
chain <type_decl 0x7fffea90bda8 TT>>
Any suggestions how to handle this?
It should work to check for an alias whether or not the target is a
TYPENAME_TYPE.
FWIW, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux.
-- >8 --
Consider
template <typename T> class A {
template <typename U> class B {
void fn(typename A<T>::B<U>);
};
};
which is rejected with
error: 'typename A<T>::B' names 'template<class T> template<class U> class
A<T>::B', which is not a type
whereas clang/icc/msvc accept it.
"typename A<T>::B<U>" is a typename-specifier. Sadly, our comments
don't mention it anywhere, because the typename-specifier wasn't in C++11;
it was only added to the language in N1376. Instead, we handle it as
an elaborated-type-specifier (not a problem thus far). So we get to
cp_parser_nested_name_specifier_opt which has a loop that breaks if we
don't see a < or ::, but that means we can -- tentatively -- parse even
B<U> which is not a nested-name-specifier (it doesn't end with a ::).
Even though we're parsing B<U> tentatively, we issue an error in
cp_parser_class_name -> make_typename_type, but here we should not. In
fact, we probably shouldn't have parsed "B<U>" at all. Fixed by the
cp_parser_class_name hunk.
I think this should compile because [temp.names]/4 says: "In a qualified-id
used as the name in a typename-specifier, elaborated-type-specifier,
using-declaration, or class-or-decltype, an optional keyword template
appearing at the top level is ignored.", added in DR 1710. Also see
DR 1812.
This issue on its own is not a significant problem or a regression.
However, in C++20, the typename here becomes optional, and so this test
is rejected in C++20, but accepted in C++17:
template <typename T> class A {
template <typename U> class B {
void fn(A<T>::B<U>);
};
};
Here we morph A<T>::B<U> into a typename-specifier, but that happens
in cp_parser_simple_type_specifier and we never handle it as above.
To fake the template keyword I'm afraid we need to use cp_parser_template_id
with template_keyword_p=true as in the patch below. The tricky thing
is to avoid breaking concepts.
To handle DR 1710, I made cp_parser_nested_name_specifier_opt assume that
when we're naming a type, the template keyword is present, too. That
revealed a bug: DR 1710 also says that the template keyword can be followed
by an alias template, but we weren't prepared to handle that. alias-decl1.C
exercise this.
DR 1710
PR c++/94057 - template keyword in a typename-specifier.
* parser.c (check_template_keyword_in_nested_name_spec): New.
(cp_parser_nested_name_specifier_opt): Implement DR1710, optional
'template'. Call check_template_keyword_in_nested_name_spec.
(cp_parser_simple_type_specifier): Assume that a <
following a qualified-id in a typename-specifier begins
a template argument list.
(cp_parser_class_name): Complain only if not parsing tentatively.
* g++.dg/cpp1y/alias-decl1.C: New test.
* g++.dg/parse/missing-template1.C: Update dg-error.
* g++.dg/parse/template3.C: Likewise.
* g++.dg/template/error4.C: Likewise.
* g++.dg/template/meminit2.C: Likewise.
* g++.dg/template/dependent-name5.C: Likewise.
* g++.dg/template/dependent-name7.C: New test.
* g++.dg/template/dependent-name8.C: New test.
* g++.dg/template/dependent-name9.C: New test.
* g++.dg/template/dependent-name10.C: New test.
* g++.dg/template/dependent-name11.C: New test.
* g++.dg/template/dependent-name12.C: New test.
* g++.dg/template/dependent-name13.C: New test.
* g++.dg/template/dr1794.C: New test.
* g++.dg/template/dr314.C: New test.
* g++.dg/template/dr1710.C: New test.
* g++.dg/template/dr1710-2.C: New test.
* g++.old-deja/g++.pt/crash38.C: Update dg-error.
---
gcc/cp/parser.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++---
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/alias-decl1.C | 9 ++
.../g++.dg/parse/missing-template1.C | 4 +-
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/template3.C | 5 +-
.../g++.dg/template/dependent-name10.C | 18 ++++
.../g++.dg/template/dependent-name11.C | 15 +++
.../g++.dg/template/dependent-name12.C | 7 ++
.../g++.dg/template/dependent-name13.C | 8 ++
.../g++.dg/template/dependent-name5.C | 2 -
.../g++.dg/template/dependent-name7.C | 9 ++
.../g++.dg/template/dependent-name8.C | 9 ++
.../g++.dg/template/dependent-name9.C | 9 ++
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dr1710-2.C | 10 ++
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dr1710.C | 9 ++
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dr1794.C | 14 +++
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dr314.C | 15 +++
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/error4.C | 3 +-
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/meminit2.C | 4 +-
gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/crash38.C | 6 +-
19 files changed, 214 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/alias-decl1.C
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name10.C
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name11.C
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name12.C
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name13.C
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name7.C
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name8.C
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name9.C
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dr1710-2.C
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dr1710.C
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dr1794.C
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dr314.C
diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.c b/gcc/cp/parser.c
index cbd5510a8fb..824fb18e83a 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/parser.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/parser.c
@@ -6266,6 +6266,39 @@ cp_parser_unqualified_id (cp_parser* parser,
}
}
+/* Check [temp.names]/5: A name prefixed by the keyword template shall
+ be a template-id or the name shall refer to a class template or an
+ alias template. */
+
+static void
+check_template_keyword_in_nested_name_spec (tree name)
+{
+ if (CLASS_TYPE_P (name)
+ && ((CLASSTYPE_USE_TEMPLATE (name)
+ && PRIMARY_TEMPLATE_P (CLASSTYPE_TI_TEMPLATE (name)))
+ || CLASSTYPE_IS_TEMPLATE (name)))
+ return;
+
+
+ if (TREE_CODE (name) == TYPENAME_TYPE)
+ {
+ if (TREE_CODE (TYPENAME_TYPE_FULLNAME (name)) == TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR)
+ return;
+ /* Alias templates are also OK. */
+ else if (TYPE_ALIAS_P (name))
+ {
+ tree tinfo = TYPE_ALIAS_TEMPLATE_INFO (name);
+ if (tinfo && DECL_ALIAS_TEMPLATE_P (TI_TEMPLATE (tinfo)))
+ return;
+ }
+ }
I think you want to check all typedefs like in e.g.
find_parameter_packs_r; if the name is a typedef, it's only suitable if
alias_template_specialization_p.
+ permerror (input_location, TYPE_P (name)
+ ? G_("%qT is not a template")
+ : G_("%qD is not a template"),
+ name);
+}
+
/* Parse an (optional) nested-name-specifier.
nested-name-specifier: [C++98]
@@ -6389,7 +6422,17 @@ cp_parser_nested_name_specifier_opt (cp_parser *parser,
/* Look for the optional `template' keyword, if this isn't the
first time through the loop. */
if (success)
- template_keyword_p = cp_parser_optional_template_keyword (parser);
+ {
+ template_keyword_p = cp_parser_optional_template_keyword (parser);
+ /* DR1710: "In a qualified-id used as the name in
+ a typename-specifier, elaborated-type-specifier, using-declaration,
+ or class-or-decltype, an optional keyword template appearing at
+ the top level is ignored." */
+ if (!template_keyword_p
+ && typename_keyword_p
+ && cp_parser_nth_token_starts_template_argument_list_p (parser,
2))
+ template_keyword_p = true;
+ }
/* Save the old scope since the name lookup we are about to do
might destroy it. */
@@ -6580,18 +6623,8 @@ cp_parser_nested_name_specifier_opt (cp_parser *parser,
if (TREE_CODE (new_scope) == TYPE_DECL)
new_scope = TREE_TYPE (new_scope);
/* Uses of "template" must be followed by actual templates. */
- if (template_keyword_p
- && !(CLASS_TYPE_P (new_scope)
- && ((CLASSTYPE_USE_TEMPLATE (new_scope)
- && PRIMARY_TEMPLATE_P (CLASSTYPE_TI_TEMPLATE (new_scope)))
- || CLASSTYPE_IS_TEMPLATE (new_scope)))
- && !(TREE_CODE (new_scope) == TYPENAME_TYPE
- && (TREE_CODE (TYPENAME_TYPE_FULLNAME (new_scope))
- == TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR)))
- permerror (input_location, TYPE_P (new_scope)
- ? G_("%qT is not a template")
- : G_("%qD is not a template"),
- new_scope);
+ if (template_keyword_p)
+ check_template_keyword_in_nested_name_spec (new_scope);
/* If it is a class scope, try to complete it; we are about to
be looking up names inside the class. */
if (TYPE_P (new_scope)
@@ -18113,6 +18146,33 @@ cp_parser_simple_type_specifier (cp_parser* parser,
}
}
}
+ /* DR 1812: A < following a qualified-id in a typename-specifier
+ could safely be assumed to begin a template argument list, so
+ the template keyword should be optional. */
+ else if (parser->scope
+ && qualified_p
+ && typename_p
+ && cp_lexer_next_token_is (parser->lexer, CPP_TEMPLATE_ID))
+ {
+ cp_parser_parse_tentatively (parser);
+
+ type = cp_parser_template_id (parser,
+ /*template_keyword_p=*/true,
+ /*check_dependency_p=*/true,
+ none_type,
+ /*is_declaration=*/false);
+ /* This is handled below, so back off. */
+ if (type && concept_check_p (type))
+ cp_parser_simulate_error (parser);
+
+ if (!cp_parser_parse_definitely (parser))
+ type = NULL_TREE;
+ else if (TREE_CODE (type) == TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR)
+ type = make_typename_type (parser->scope, type, typename_type,
+ /*complain=*/tf_error);
+ else if (TREE_CODE (type) != TYPE_DECL)
+ type = NULL_TREE;
+ }
/* Otherwise, look for a type-name. */
if (!type)
@@ -23636,8 +23696,9 @@ cp_parser_class_name (cp_parser *parser,
&& decl != error_mark_node
&& !is_overloaded_fn (decl))
{
- decl = make_typename_type (scope, decl, typename_type,
- /*complain=*/tf_error);
+ tsubst_flags_t complain = (cp_parser_parsing_tentatively (parser)
+ ? tf_none : tf_error);
+ decl = make_typename_type (scope, decl, typename_type, complain);
Why?
if (decl != error_mark_node)
decl = TYPE_NAME (decl);
}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/alias-decl1.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/alias-decl1.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..e5397e71bd6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/alias-decl1.C
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+// DR 1710 - Missing template keyword in class-or-decltype
+// { dg-do compile { target c++14 } }
+
+template <int> struct S {
+ template <int> struct A;
+ template <int N> using U = typename A<N>::foo;
+};
+template <typename T> typename S<1>::U<T::foo>::type a;
+template <typename T> typename S<1>::template U<T::foo>::type a2;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/missing-template1.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/missing-template1.C
index fcc3aa0c3ff..19c1433d09f 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/missing-template1.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/missing-template1.C
@@ -12,9 +12,7 @@ template <typename T> struct A
template <typename T> void foo()
{
- typedef typename A<T>::B<T>::X Y; // { dg-error "non-template" "non" }
- // { dg-error "not declare" "decl" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
- // { dg-message "note" "note" { target *-*-* } .-2 }
+ typedef typename A<T>::B<T>::X Y;
}
void bar()
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/template3.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/template3.C
index c284a5ee040..8da8a48a3c3 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/template3.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/template3.C
@@ -13,7 +13,4 @@ struct X : Outer<b>::template Inner<T>
{};
template <bool b, typename T>
-struct Y : Outer<b>::Inner<T> {}; // { dg-error "used as template" "temp" }
-// { dg-error "expected" "exp" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
-// { dg-message "note" "note" { target *-*-* } .-2 }
-
+struct Y : Outer<b>::Inner<T> {};
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name10.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name10.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..18e024f7e6d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name10.C
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+// PR c++/94057 - template keyword in a typename-specifier.
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+template<typename T> struct A {
+ template<typename U> struct B {
+ typedef int TT;
+ typedef int TT2;
+ typedef int TT3;
+ typedef int TT4;
+ };
+};
+
+struct X : A<int>::B<int> {
+ using A<int>::template B<int>::TT;
+ using typename A<int>::template B<int>::TT2;
+ using A<int>::B<int>::TT3;
+ using typename A<int>::B<int>::TT4;
+};
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name11.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name11.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..687a9bd5df5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name11.C
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+// PR c++/94057 - template keyword in a typename-specifier.
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+template<typename T> struct A {
+ template<typename U>
+ struct W { };
+};
+
+void
+g ()
+{
+ // class-key nested-name-specifier template[opt] simple-template-id
+ struct A<int>::W<int> w;
+ struct A<int>::template W<int> w2;
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name12.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name12.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..7ee94e7457d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name12.C
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+// PR c++/94057 - template keyword in a typename-specifier.
+
+template <bool> struct A;
+template <typename, typename> struct B;
+template <typename T, typename U, typename V> struct B<T U::*, V> {
+ typename A<V::x>::type::type t;
+};
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name13.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name13.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..1e971168657
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name13.C
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+// DR 1710 - Missing template keyword in class-or-decltype
+
+template<typename T> struct S {
+ void fn(typename T::template B<int>::template C<int>);
+ void fn2(typename T::B<int>::template C<int>);
+ void fn3(typename T::template B<int>::C<int>);
+ void fn4(typename T::B<int>::C<int>);
+};
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name5.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name5.C
index fc78983324b..15c1acb0347 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name5.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name5.C
@@ -22,9 +22,7 @@ struct A
typedef N<int> type6;
typedef A::N<int> type7;
-// { dg-error "" "" { target c++2a } .-1 }
typedef A<T>::N<int> type8;
-// { dg-error "" "" { target c++2a } .-1 }
typedef A<T*>::template N<int> type9; // { dg-error "" "" { target
c++17_down } }
typedef typename A<T*>::template N<int> type10;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name7.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name7.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..3dfa42d2df0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name7.C
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+// PR c++/94057 - template keyword in a typename-specifier.
+// { dg-do compile }
+
+template<typename T> struct A {
+ template<typename U> struct B {
+ B(A<T>::B<U>&);
+ void fn(A<T>::B<U>);
+ };
+};
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name8.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name8.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ad9e44f9b85
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name8.C
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+// PR c++/94057 - template keyword in a typename-specifier.
+// { dg-do compile }
+
+template<typename T> struct A {
+ template<typename U> struct B {
+ B(typename A<T>::B<U>&);
+ void fn(typename A<T>::B<U>);
+ };
+};
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name9.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name9.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..6dfdbc176c1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name9.C
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+// PR c++/94057 - template keyword in a typename-specifier.
+// { dg-do compile }
+
+template<typename T> struct A {
+ template<typename U> struct B {
+ B(typename A<T>::template B<U>&);
+ void fn(typename A<T>::template B<U>);
+ };
+};
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dr1710-2.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dr1710-2.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..99d49b746b2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dr1710-2.C
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+// DR 1710 - Missing template keyword in class-or-decltype
+// { dg-do compile }
+
+template<typename T> struct A {
+ template<typename U> struct B {
+ };
+};
+
+template<typename T> struct D : A<int>::B<int> {};
+template<typename T> struct D2 : A<int>::template B<int> {};
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dr1710.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dr1710.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c945977971f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dr1710.C
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+// DR 1710 - Missing template keyword in class-or-decltype
+// { dg-do compile }
+
+template<typename T> struct D : T::template B<int>::template C<int> {};
+template<typename T> struct D2 : T::B<int>::template C<int> {};
+template<typename T> struct D3 : T::template B<int>::C<int> {};
+template<typename T> struct D4 : T::B<int>::C<int> {};
+template<typename T> struct D5 : T::template B<int>::type::type {};
+template<typename T> struct D6 : T::B<int>::type::type {};
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dr1794.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dr1794.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f629d7d0b98
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dr1794.C
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// DR 1794 - template keyword and alias templates.
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+template<template<typename> class Template>
+struct Internal {
+ template<typename Arg>
+ using Bind = Template<Arg>;
+};
+
+template<template<typename> class Template, typename Arg>
+using Instantiate = Template<Arg>;
+
+template<template<typename> class Template, typename Argument>
+using Bind = Instantiate<Internal<Template>::template Bind, Argument>;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dr314.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dr314.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..7c0d8ac592f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dr314.C
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+// DR 314 - template in base class specifier.
+
+template <typename T>
+struct A {
+ template <typename U>
+ struct B {};
+};
+
+template <typename T>
+struct C : public A<T>::template B<T> {
+};
+
+template <typename T>
+struct C2 : public A<int>::B<T> {
+};
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/error4.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/error4.C
index 9d76561aa02..a5030f06c98 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/error4.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/error4.C
@@ -5,5 +5,4 @@ template<class T> struct C1
};
template<class T, class U>
-void foo(typename C1<T>::C2<U>::Type *) { } // { dg-error "template" "error " }
-// { dg-message "note" "note" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
+void foo(typename C1<T>::C2<U>::Type *) { }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/meminit2.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/meminit2.C
index db6e0427fc7..6a56a806746 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/meminit2.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/meminit2.C
@@ -14,8 +14,6 @@ struct A : typename O<T>::template I<int> { // { dg-error
"keyword 'typename'
template <typename T>
struct B : O<T>::template I<int> {
- B() : O<T>::I<int>() // { dg-error "used as template|it is a template" }
+ B() : O<T>::I<int>()
{}
};
-
-// { dg-bogus "end of input" "bogus token skipping in the parser" { xfail
*-*-* } 17 }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/crash38.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/crash38.C
index 5d386132436..60cd5e3f44e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/crash38.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/crash38.C
@@ -3,10 +3,8 @@
template <class T>
struct S {
- typedef typename T::Y<T>::Z X; // { dg-error "non-template" "non-template" }
No Y in A
-// { dg-message "note" "note" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
-// { dg-error "does not declare" "not declare" { target *-*-* } .-2 }
- X x; // { dg-error "does not name a type" } No Y in A
+ typedef typename T::Y<T>::Z X; // { dg-error "not a class template" } No Y
in A
+ X x;
};
struct A {
base-commit: c2211a60ff05b7a0289d3e287e72c181bb4d5d8b
