It turns out RTL CSE tries to remove redundant stores but fails to
do the usual validity check what such a change is TBAA neutral to
later loads.

This now triggers with the PR93946 testcases on nios2.

Bootstrap & regtest running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.

Richard.

2020-04-08  Richard Biener  <rguent...@suse.de>

        PR rtl-optimization/93946
        * cse.c (cse_insn): Record the tabled expression in
        src_related.  Verify a redundant store removal is valid.
---
 gcc/cse.c | 13 +++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/cse.c b/gcc/cse.c
index 3e8724b3fed..f07bbdbebad 100644
--- a/gcc/cse.c
+++ b/gcc/cse.c
@@ -5074,7 +5074,7 @@ cse_insn (rtx_insn *insn)
             to prefer it.  Copy it to src_related.  The code below will
             then give it a negative cost.  */
          if (GET_CODE (dest) == code && rtx_equal_p (p->exp, dest))
-           src_related = dest;
+           src_related = p->exp;
        }
 
       /* Find the cheapest valid equivalent, trying all the available
@@ -5332,7 +5332,16 @@ cse_insn (rtx_insn *insn)
                   && rtx_equal_p (trial, dest)
                   && !side_effects_p (dest)
                   && (cfun->can_delete_dead_exceptions
-                      || insn_nothrow_p (insn)))
+                      || insn_nothrow_p (insn))
+                  /* We can only remove the later store if the earlier aliases
+                     at least all accesses the later one.  */
+                  && (!MEM_P (trial)
+                      || ((MEM_ALIAS_SET (dest) == MEM_ALIAS_SET (trial)
+                           || alias_set_subset_of (MEM_ALIAS_SET (dest),
+                                                   MEM_ALIAS_SET (trial)))
+                           && (!MEM_EXPR (trial)
+                               || refs_same_for_tbaa_p (MEM_EXPR (trial),
+                                                        MEM_EXPR (dest))))))
            {
              SET_SRC (sets[i].rtl) = trial;
              noop_insn = true;
-- 
2.16.4

Reply via email to