I just joined the gcc-patches list, so I hope the mail software can parse this out with an "In-Reply-To" header.
I work for Marvell, and Anton's work is approved for submittal. I wrote the first version of the .md file. I'm certain we have a copyright assignment.in place, as we've had employees in the past six months submit changes, for example Steve Ellcey. Joel Jones >Hi Anton, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Gcc-patches <gcc-patches-boun...@gcc.gnu.org> On Behalf Of Anton >> Youdkevitch >> Sent: 20 April 2020 19:29 >> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org >> Cc: jo...@marvell.com >> Subject: [PATCH v2] aarch64: Add TX3 machine model >> >> Here is the patch introducing thunderxt311 maching model >> for the scheduler. A name for the new chip was added to the >> list of the names to be recognized as a valid parameter for mcpu >> and mtune flags. The TX2 cost model was reused for TX3. >> >> The previously used "cryptic" name for the command line >> parameter is replaced with the same "thunderxt311" name. >> >> Bootstrapped on AArch64. > >Thanks for the patch. I had meant to ask, do you have a copyright assignment >in place? >We'd need one to accept a contribution of this size. >Thanks, >Kyrill > >> >> 2020-04-20 Anton Youdkevitch <anton.youdkevi...@bell-sw.com> >> >> * config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def: Add the chip name. >> * config/aarch64/aarch64-tune.md: Regenerated. >> * gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c: Add the cost tables for the chip. >> * gcc/config/aarch64/thunderx3t11.md: New file: add the new >> machine model for the scheduler >> * gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md: Include the new model. >> >> --- >> gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def | 3 + >> gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tune.md | 2 +- >> gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c | 27 + >> gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md | 1 + >> gcc/config/aarch64/thunderx3t11.md | 686 +++++++++++++++ >> 5 files changed, 718 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
