This third patch of three actually fixes the PR.  We were using
8-bit BIT_FIELD_REFs to access single-bit elements, and multiplying
the vector index by 8 bits rather than 1 bit.

Tested individually on aarch64-linux-gnu and as a series on
x86_64-linux-gnu.  OK to install?

I'm not sure what to do about backports.  Arguably the PR is
really a progression rather than a regression, since we went
from generating wrong code to ICEing.  I'm not at all convinced
that this fixes all the vector-lowering problems associated
with packed booleans, and there's a danger that we could regress
to wrong code if we backported a piecemeal fix.

Richard


2020-05-11  Richard Sandiford  <richard.sandif...@arm.com>

gcc/
        PR tree-optimization/94980
        * tree-vect-generic.c (expand_vector_comparison): Use
        vector_element_bits_tree to get the element size in bits,
        rather than using TYPE_SIZE.
        (expand_vector_condition, vector_element): Likewise.

gcc/testsuite/
        PR tree-optimization/94980
        * gcc.target/i386/pr94980.c: New test.
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr94980.c | 10 ++++++++++
 gcc/tree-vect-generic.c                 |  8 ++++----
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr94980.c

diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-generic.c b/gcc/tree-vect-generic.c
index adea9337a97..a7fe83da0e3 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-generic.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-generic.c
@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ expand_vector_comparison (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, tree 
type, tree op0,
                                                (TREE_TYPE (type)))))
        {
          tree inner_type = TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (op0));
-         tree part_width = TYPE_SIZE (inner_type);
+         tree part_width = vector_element_bits_tree (TREE_TYPE (op0));
          tree index = bitsize_int (0);
          int nunits = nunits_for_known_piecewise_op (TREE_TYPE (op0));
          int prec = GET_MODE_PRECISION (SCALAR_TYPE_MODE (type));
@@ -944,9 +944,9 @@ expand_vector_condition (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi)
   vec<constructor_elt, va_gc> *v;
   tree constr;
   tree inner_type = TREE_TYPE (type);
+  tree width = vector_element_bits_tree (type);
   tree cond_type = TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (a));
   tree comp_inner_type = cond_type;
-  tree width = TYPE_SIZE (inner_type);
   tree index = bitsize_int (0);
   tree comp_width = width;
   tree comp_index = index;
@@ -960,7 +960,7 @@ expand_vector_condition (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi)
       a1 = TREE_OPERAND (a, 0);
       a2 = TREE_OPERAND (a, 1);
       comp_inner_type = TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (a1));
-      comp_width = TYPE_SIZE (comp_inner_type);
+      comp_width = vector_element_bits_tree (TREE_TYPE (a1));
     }
 
   if (expand_vec_cond_expr_p (type, TREE_TYPE (a1), TREE_CODE (a)))
@@ -1333,7 +1333,7 @@ vector_element (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, tree vect, 
tree idx, tree *ptmpvec)
         }
       else
         {
-         tree size = TYPE_SIZE (vect_elt_type);
+         tree size = vector_element_bits_tree (vect_type);
          tree pos = fold_build2 (MULT_EXPR, bitsizetype, bitsize_int (index),
                                  size);
          return fold_build3 (BIT_FIELD_REF, vect_elt_type, vect, size, pos);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr94980.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr94980.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..488f94abec9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr94980.c
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-mavx512vl" } */
+
+int __attribute__((__vector_size__(16))) v;
+
+void
+foo(void)
+{
+  0 <= (0 != v) >= 0;
+}

Reply via email to