Since r10-7096 convert_like, when called in a template, creates an IMPLICIT_CONV_EXPR when we're converting to/from array type.
In this test, we have e[f], and we're converting f (of type class A) to int, so convert_like in build_new_op_1 created the IMPLICIT_CONV_EXPR that got into cp_build_array_ref which calls maybe_constant_value. My patch above failed to adjust this spot to call fold_non_dependent_expr instead, which can handle codes like I_C_E in a template. Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk/10? gcc/cp/ChangeLog: PR c++/95508 * typeck.c (cp_build_array_ref): Call fold_non_dependent_expr instead of maybe_constant_value. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR c++/95508 * g++.dg/template/conv16.C: New test. --- gcc/cp/typeck.c | 2 +- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/conv16.C | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/conv16.C diff --git a/gcc/cp/typeck.c b/gcc/cp/typeck.c index f01ae656254..07144d4c1fc 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/typeck.c +++ b/gcc/cp/typeck.c @@ -3565,7 +3565,7 @@ cp_build_array_ref (location_t loc, tree array, tree idx, pointer arithmetic.) */ idx = cp_perform_integral_promotions (idx, complain); - idx = maybe_constant_value (idx); + idx = fold_non_dependent_expr (idx, complain); /* An array that is indexed by a non-constant cannot be stored in a register; we must be able to do diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/conv16.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/conv16.C new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c0843efdf9d --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/conv16.C @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +// PR c++/95508 +// { dg-do compile } + +template <typename> +struct A; +template <typename> +struct B { + operator int () { return 0; } +}; +template <> +struct A<unsigned> : B<int> {}; +struct D { + template <typename> + int foo () { return e[f]; } + int e[6]; + A<unsigned> f; +}; base-commit: a2c2cee92e5defff9bf23d3b1184ee96e57e5fdd -- Marek Polacek • Red Hat, Inc. • 300 A St, Boston, MA