On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 10:55:59AM -0500, will schmidt wrote: > On Tue, 2020-06-30 at 18:39 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 12:57:45PM -0500, will schmidt wrote: > > > Add support for the vmsumudm instruction and tie it into the > > > vec_msum > > > built-in to support the variants of that built-in using vector > > > _int128 parameters. > > > 2020-06-18 Will Schmidt <will_schm...@vnet.ibm.com> > > > > > > * config/rs6000/altivec.h (vec_vmsumudm): New define. > > > * config/rs6000/altivec.md (UNSPEC_VMSUMUDM): New unspec. > > > (altivec_vmsumudm): New define_insn. > > > * config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin.def (altivec_vmsumudm): New > > > BU_ALTIVEC_3 entry. (vmsumudm): New BU_ALTIVEC_OVERLOAD_3 > > > entry. > > > > No line break before (vmsumudm) please. > > > > > * config/rs6000/rs6000-call.c > > > (altivec_overloaded_builtins): > > > Add entries for ALTIVEC_BUILTIN_VMSUMUDM variants of > > > vec_msum. > > > > Tha patch is okay for trunk with that (and some int128 selector in > > the > > testcases that need one). Thanks! > > Thanks for the review, etc. > > OK for backports too? (after baking on trunk for a bit).
Yes please. Do it in time before the RC? Thanks! Segher
