Hi! On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 05:11:11PM -0500, will schmidt wrote: > > > That is probably a level of detail that is not > > > really needed in the GCC code comment. Probably best to just > > > change > > > the comment to read something like "ISA 3.0 sign extend builtins". > > > > Sounds good. > > As long as there are no issues defining the builtins for 3.0 here. > AFAIK they are not documented in ISA 3.0. This is a happy accident > that these ISA 3.1 builtins can be implemented with existing support.
There are *no* builtins defined in the ISA! The insns are just ISA 3.0 instructions. Segher
