On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 9:35 AM H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 9:29 AM Hongtao Liu <crazy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 11:50 PM Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 5:41 PM Hongtao Liu <crazy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 9:15 PM Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > gcc/
> > > > > > > >         PR target/88808
> > > > > > > >         * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_preferred_reload_class): 
> > > > > > > > Allow
> > > > > > > >         QImode data go into mask registers.
> > > > > > > >         * config/i386/i386.md: (*movhi_internal): Adjust 
> > > > > > > > constraints
> > > > > > > >         for mask registers.
> > > > > > > >         (*movqi_internal): Ditto.
> > > > > > > >         (*anddi_1): Support mask register operations
> > > > > > > >         (*and<mode>_1): Ditto.
> > > > > > > >         (*andqi_1): Ditto.
> > > > > > > >         (*andn<mode>_1): Ditto.
> > > > > > > >         (*<code><mode>_1): Ditto.
> > > > > > > >         (*<code>qi_1): Ditto.
> > > > > > > >         (*one_cmpl<mode>2_1): Ditto.
> > > > > > > >         (*one_cmplsi2_1_zext): Ditto.
> > > > > > > >         (*one_cmplqi2_1): Ditto.
> > > > > > > >         (define_peephole2): Move constant 0/-1 directly into 
> > > > > > > > mask
> > > > > > > >         registers.
> > > > > > > >         * config/i386/predicates.md (mask_reg_operand): New 
> > > > > > > > predicate.
> > > > > > > >         * config/i386/sse.md (define_split): Add post-reload 
> > > > > > > > splitters
> > > > > > > >         that would convert "generic" patterns to mask patterns.
> > > > > > > >         (*knotsi_1_zext): New define_insn.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > gcc/testsuite/
> > > > > > > >         * gcc.target/i386/bitwise_mask_op-1.c: New test.
> > > > > > > >         * gcc.target/i386/bitwise_mask_op-2.c: New test.
> > > > > > > >         * gcc.target/i386/bitwise_mask_op-3.c: New test.
> > > > > > > >         * gcc.target/i386/avx512bw-pr88465.c: New testcase.
> > > > > > > >         * gcc.target/i386/avx512bw-kunpckwd-1.c: Adjust 
> > > > > > > > testcase.
> > > > > > > >         * gcc.target/i386/avx512bw-kunpckwd-3.c: Ditto.
> > > > > > > >         * gcc.target/i386/avx512dq-kmovb-5.c: Ditto.
> > > > > > > >         * gcc.target/i386/avx512f-kmovw-5.c: Ditto.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > A little nit, please put new splitters after the instruction 
> > > > > > > pattern.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > OK for the whole patch set with the above change,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yes, thanks for the review.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please note that your patch introduces several testsuite fails with 
> > > > > -m32:
> > > > >
> > > > > gcc -O2 -mavx512bitalg -mavx512bw -m32 -g avx512bitalg-vpopcntb-1.c
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I can't reproduce this failure.
> > >
> > > Because you are running it on AVX512 enabled target.
> > >
> > > > > Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction.
> > > > > 0x080490ac in __get_cpuid_count (__edx=<synthetic pointer>,
> > > > > __ecx=<synthetic pointer>, __ebx=<synthetic pointer>, __eax=<synthetic
> > > > > pointer>,
> > > > >     __subleaf=0, __leaf=7) at 
> > > > > /hdd/uros/gcc-build-fast/gcc/include/cpuid.h:316
> > > > > 316       __cpuid_count (__leaf, __subleaf, *__eax, *__ebx, *__ecx, 
> > > > > *__edx);
> > > > >
> > > > >    0x080490a3 <+51>:    cpuid
> > > > >    0x080490a5 <+53>:    mov    $0x1,%eax
> > > > >    0x080490aa <+58>:    mov    %ecx,%esi
> > > > > => 0x080490ac <+60>:    kmovd  %ebx,%k0
> > > > >    0x080490b0 <+64>:    mov    %edi,%ecx
> > > > >    0x080490b2 <+66>:    mov    %edi,%ebx
> > > > >
> > > > > kmov insn is generated for __cpuid_count function, where the binary
> > > > > determines, if the new instructions are supported. The binary will
> > > > > crash in the detection code if the processor lacks AVX512
> > > > > instructions.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > IMHO, the testcase shouldn't be run on processors without AVX512BW.
> > >
> > > No, it could run, because it checks for AVX512BW at runtime.
> > >
> >
> > Got it.
> >
> > > > Because in  avx512bitalg-vpopcntb-1.c, there's /*
> > > > dg-require-effective-target avx512bw } */.
> > >
> > > This is to check the toolchain for support.
> > >
> > > > what's the version of your assembler?
> > >
> > > GNU assembler version 2.34-4.fc32
> > >
> >
> > If assembler supports avx512bw, but processor not, the test would pass
> > condition `dg-require-effective-target avx512bw` and be runned.
> > then crashed for illegal instruction.
> >
> > > Please add something like
> > > X86_TUNE_INTER_UNIT_MOVES_FROM_MASK/X86_TUNE_INTER_UNIT_MOVES_TO_MASK
> > > and enable them only for m_CORE_AVX512 (or perhaps m_INTEL).
> > >
> > > Handle this in inline_secondary_memory_needed to reject direct moves
> > > for all other targets. This should disable direct moves for generic
> > > targets.
> > >
> >
> > Yes, I'll add it.
> >
>
>
> (define_insn "*movsi_internal"
>   [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "nonimmediate_operand"
>     "=r,m ,*y,*y,?*y,?m,?r,?*y,*v,*v,*v,m ,?r,?*v,*k,*k ,*rm,*k")
>         (match_operand:SI 1 "general_operand"
>     "g ,re,C ,*y,m  ,*y,*y,r  ,C ,*v,m ,*v,*v,r  ,*r,*km,*k ,CBC"))]
>   "!(MEM_P (operands[0]) && MEM_P (operands[1]))"
> ...
>  [(set (attr "isa")
>      (cond [(eq_attr "alternative" "12,13")
>               (const_string "sse2")
>            ]
>            (const_string "*")))
>
> is wrong.   mask register alternatives should be marked with avx512f.
> Please fix it.   Other integer move patterns may have the same issue.
> Once these are fixed,
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx512-check.h
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx512-check.h
> index 0a377dba1d5..576e9b390c6 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx512-check.h
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx512-check.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ do_test (void)
>  }
>  #endif
>
> +__attribute__((target ("no-avx512f")))
>  static int
>  check_osxsave (void)
>  {
> @@ -34,6 +35,7 @@ check_osxsave (void)
>    return (ecx & bit_OSXSAVE) != 0;
>  }
>
> +__attribute__((target ("no-avx512f")))
>  int
>  main ()
>  {
>
> should work.
>

Like this.  You need to check all integer patterns with mskmov and msklog.

-- 
H.J.
From ac4407e52514679012312e7f223c342f9223ddff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.to...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 09:42:49 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Fix *movsi_internal

---
 gcc/config/i386/cpuid.h                      | 5 +++++
 gcc/config/i386/i386.md                      | 2 ++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx512-check.h | 5 +++++
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/cpuid.h b/gcc/config/i386/cpuid.h
index bca61d620db..ecb249fade7 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/cpuid.h
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/cpuid.h
@@ -24,6 +24,9 @@
 #ifndef _CPUID_H_INCLUDED
 #define _CPUID_H_INCLUDED
 
+#pragma GCC push_options
+#pragma GCC target("no-avx")
+
 /* %eax */
 #define bit_AVX512BF16	(1 << 5)
 
@@ -324,4 +327,6 @@ __cpuidex (int __cpuid_info[4], int __leaf, int __subleaf)
 		 __cpuid_info[2], __cpuid_info[3]);
 }
 
+#pragma GCC pop_options
+
 #endif /* _CPUID_H_INCLUDED */
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
index 446793b78db..cf5828c23d5 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
@@ -2349,6 +2349,8 @@ (define_insn "*movsi_internal"
   [(set (attr "isa")
      (cond [(eq_attr "alternative" "12,13")
 	      (const_string "sse2")
+	    (eq_attr "alternative" "14,15,16,17")
+	      (const_string "avx512f")
 	   ]
 	   (const_string "*")))
    (set (attr "type")
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx512-check.h b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx512-check.h
index 0a377dba1d5..094453e5e0e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx512-check.h
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx512-check.h
@@ -25,6 +25,9 @@ do_test (void)
 }
 #endif
 
+#pragma GCC push_options
+#pragma GCC target("no-avx")
+
 static int
 check_osxsave (void)
 {
@@ -110,3 +113,5 @@ main ()
 #endif
   return 0;
 }
+
+#pragma GCC pop_options
-- 
2.26.2

Reply via email to