> The patch misses documentation of the pragma. This was an intentional omission - when looking for documentation of the pragma in clang I found none.
If we do want to document the pragmas in GCC: - what section of the documentation would that go in? - gcc/doc/cpp.texi, section 7, "Pragmas" - this section states: "This manual documents the pragmas which are meaningful to the preprocessor itself. Other pragmas are meaningful to the C or C++ compilers. They are documented in the GCC manual." - these pragmas aren't exactly meaningful to the preprocessor _or_ the C/C++ compiler, so it's not exactly clear where they fit. - gcc/doc/extend.texi, section 6.62, "Pragmas Accepted by GCC" - what exactly would it say? - I guess just mention the existence and that they won't trigger unknown pragma warnings? They don't _do_ anything Austin