> > Going back to the default hook, I guess one option is: > > rtx zero = CONST0_RTX (reg_raw_mode[regno]); > rtx_insn *insn = emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (regno_reg_rtx[regno], zero)); > if (!valid_insn_p (insn)) > sorry (…); “Sorry” here will tell the user that the implementation on this platform is not valid? Qing > > but with some mechanism to avoid spewing the user with messages > for the same problem. > > Thanks, > Richard
Re: Another issue on RS6000 target. Re: One issue with default implementation of zero_call_used_regs
- Re: One issue with... Richard Sandiford
- Re: One issue with... Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches
- Another issue on RS6000 target. Re: One ... Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches
- Re: Another issue on RS6000 target.... Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches
- Re: Another issue on RS6000 tar... Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches
- Re: Another issue on RS6000... Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches
- Re: Another issue on RS... Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches
- Re: Another issue on RS... Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches
- Re: Another issue ... Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches
- Re: Another issue ... Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches
- Re: Another issue ... Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches
- Re: Another issue ... Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches
- Re: Another issue ... Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches
- Re: Another issue ... Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches