[PATCH] libstdc++: Apply proposed resolutions for LWG 3428, 3447

[Patrick Palka via Gcc-patches]

Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.  Does this look OK for trunk and the 10
branch?

libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

        * include/std/ranges (single_view::single_view): Mark the
        in place constructor explicit as per LWG 3428.
        (take_view): Remove the constraint on the deduction guide's
        template parameter as per LWG 3447.
---
 libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges | 9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges
index 4d3a4940c6f..a3e5354848a 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges
@@ -205,9 +205,11 @@ namespace ranges
       : _M_value(std::move(__t))
       { }
 
+      // _GLIBCXX_RESOLVE_LIB_DEFECTS
+      // 3428. single_view's in place constructor should be explicit
       template<typename... _Args>
        requires constructible_from<_Tp, _Args...>
-       constexpr
+       constexpr explicit
        single_view(in_place_t, _Args&&... __args)
        : _M_value{in_place, std::forward<_Args>(__args)...}
        { }
@@ -1801,7 +1803,10 @@ namespace views
       }
     };
 
-  template<range _Range>
+  // _GLIBCXX_RESOLVE_LIB_DEFECTS
+  // 3447. Deduction guides for take_view and drop_view have different
+  // constraints
+  template<typename _Range>
     take_view(_Range&&, range_difference_t<_Range>)
       -> take_view<views::all_t<_Range>>;
 
-- 
2.29.0.rc0