As found/reported by Thomas, the redefinition of dummy arguments with the VALUE attribute was erroneously rejected for pure procedures. A related purity check did not take VALUE into account and was therefore adjusted.
Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for master? Thanks, Harald PR fortran/97491 - Wrong restriction for VALUE arguments of pure procedures A dummy argument with the VALUE attribute may be redefined in a PURE or ELEMENTAL procedure. Adjust the associated purity check. gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: * resolve.c (gfc_impure_variable): A dummy argument with the VALUE attribute may be redefined without making a procedure impure. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gfortran.dg/value_8.f90: New test.
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c index a210f9aad43..096108f4317 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c @@ -16476,6 +16507,7 @@ gfc_impure_variable (gfc_symbol *sym) proc = sym->ns->proc_name; if (sym->attr.dummy + && !sym->attr.value && ((proc->attr.subroutine && sym->attr.intent == INTENT_IN) || proc->attr.function)) return 1; diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/value_8.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/value_8.f90 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8273fe88b60 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/value_8.f90 @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +! { dg-do compile } +! PR97491 - Wrong restriction for VALUE arguments of pure procedures + +pure function foo (x) result (ret) + integer :: ret + integer, value :: x + x = x / 2 + ret = x +end function foo + +elemental function foo1 (x) + integer :: foo1 + integer, value :: x + x = x / 2 + foo1 = x +end function foo1